Is Fatigue a Long-term Side Effect of Breast
Cancer Treatment?
Paul B. Jacobsen, PhD, and Kevin Stein, PhD
Abstract
Background: Fatigue is one of the most common and distressing symptoms experienced by breast cancer survivors. Despite its prevalence, relatively little is known about the characteristics, etiology, or treatment of fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Methods: This report reviews studies that assessed fatigue in breast cancer patients previously treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Results: A review of the literature suggests that breast cancer patients who undergo adjuvant chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplantation experience clinically significant levels of fatigue for months or even years following the completion of active treatment. In contrast, there is little evidence that patients who receive only regional therapy (ie, surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy) experience clinically significant fatigue as a long-term treatment side effect. Conclusions: A growing body of evidence indicates that persistent fatigue can be a long-term side effect of certain forms of breast cancer treatment. The challenges for the future will be to determine the etiology of fatigue among breast cancer survivors and to develop interventions that are effective in preventing or reducing fatigue following breast cancer treatment. [Cancer Control; JMCC 6(3):256-263, 1999. © 1999 Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute]
Introduction
Breast cancer is the leading form of cancer in US women.[1] Of the 175,000 women expected to be diagnosed with this disease in 1999, it is estimated that 85% will survive five years or more.[1] A growing body of evidence indicates that these survivors experience a variety of problems that adversely affect their quality of life. Among the most common are problems associated with ovarian functioning, sexual functioning, body image, pain, and fatigue.[2,3] Although fatigue is one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms experienced by breast cancer survivors, this topic has only recently begun to receive serious attention. Interest in the problem of fatigue is growing among clinicians and researchers alike[4-7] and is consistent with a greater awareness of the importance of quality of life as an outcome in oncology.[8,9] The aim of this report is to summarize research that has investigated fatigue among breast cancer survivors and to outline directions for future work in this area. Before reviewing the research, however, it is necessary to review several important methodologic issues in the study of fatigue.
Methodologic Issues in the Study of Fatigue
Previous research on fatigue in cancer patients has been characterized by a number of methodologic limitations. One issue pertains to the manner in which fatigue is measured. At present, there is no consensus regarding the optimal means of assessing fatigue in cancer patients. As a result, a variety of self-report techniques are used. Much of the time, fatigue is measured using a single item embedded in a symptom checklist such as the Symptom Distress Scale[10] or the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist.[11] Visual analogue scales and the single-item Rhoten Fatigue Scale[12] are also used. Due to their format, these single-item measures have limited reliability and provide only the most perfunctory information about patients' experiences with fatigue. Fatigue is also frequently assessed using multi-item measures such as the Fatigue Scale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS).[13] Although multi-item measures possess better psychometric properties than single-item measures, they are limited in that they provide information only about patients' general level of fatigue severity. In a more comprehensive approach to the assessment of fatigue, several investigators have developed multidimensional measures.[14,15]
Two measures recently developed by our research group illustrate this approach. The Fatigue Symptom Inventory[16] is a 14-item measure that consists of separate subscales assessing the intensity and duration of fatigue, as well as its perceived interference with quality of life. The Fatigue Symptom Inventory is designed to be used in conjunction with the 30-item Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form,[17] which provides information about the patient's experiences with the behavioral, cognitive, physical, and affective manifestations of fatigue.
A second methodologic limitation involves the frequent use of cross-sectional research designs to study changes in fatigue over time. In using a cross-sectional design, researchers attempt to draw conclusions about the persistence or resolution of fatigue by comparing individuals who vary in the time elapsed since they completed cancer treatment. This methodologic approach is limited by the fact that the observed changes over time also reflect individual differences in patients' experience of fatigue. A more methodologically sound approach is the use of a longitudinal design in which the same patients are assessed on multiple occasions following treatment completion. Although costly in terms of both time and resources, data from longitudinal studies could greatly clarify the natural history of fatigue in cancer survivors.
A third limitation of previous research involves the absence of comparison groups. Since fatigue is a common symptom in the general population, some frame of reference is necessary in order to evaluate reports of fatigue obtained from cancer patients.
Ideally, researchers should also obtain data about fatigue from samples of individuals without cancer whose sociodemographic characteristics (eg, age, gender, and education) are similar to those of the patients under study. In addition to providing useful reference values, data from comparison groups may also be helpful in evaluating the sensitivity of different fatigue measures and in identifying the symptoms of fatigue that distinguish different patient and nonpatient populations.
An additional limitation of previous research has been the tendency to recruit samples of breast cancer survivors that are heterogeneous with regard to the previous treatment. That is, the samples include women treated with varying combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy. Typically, these samples do not include enough women who received comparable forms of therapy in order to conduct meaningful comparisons based on the type of treatment. A more useful strategy, illustrated in the studies reviewed below, is to recruit patients who received the same form(s) of therapy in sufficient numbers in order to be able to examine what may be important treatment-specific differences in fatigue.
With these considerations in mind, we now turn to a review of research that has examined fatigue in women with breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Fatigue After Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Previous research has consistently shown that women with breast cancer generally experience heightened fatigue during the course of adjuvant radiotherapy treatment.[18-24] Table 1 lists studies that have examined the characteristics of fatigue in breast cancer patients after completion of adjuvant radiotherapy treatment.
Evidence of persistent fatigue following adjuvant radiotherapy comes primarily from a study conducted by Berglund and colleagues.[25] In this study, fatigue was assessed in women with breast cancer who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy between two and 10 years previously and were recurrence-free at the time of follow-up. Data obtained using a symptom checklist indicated that fatigue was the most commonly reported symptom and was present in 76% of patients. Additional results indicated that fatigue severity was unrelated to either patient age or time since completion of radiotherapy treatment.
In contrast to these findings, results from three other studies suggest that fatigue does not persist following completion of adjuvant radiotherapy treatment. In one of the first studies to address this issue, Greenberg et al[20] assessed fatigue in women with breast cancer during the course of adjuvant radiotherapy treatment and then following treatment at 3 weeks and at 11 to 14 weeks. Fatigue was assessed using an average score derived from the administration of three separate fatigue scales: the POMS Fatigue Scale,[13] the Pearson-Byars Fatigue Feeling Checklist,[19] and a visual analog scale. Results indicated that fatigue decreased from baseline during the first two weeks of treatment but then increased steadily before reaching a plateau by the fourth week of treatment. Thereafter, levels of fatigue diminished significantly and were found to be at pretreatment levels by the third week following treatment completion. No further changes in fatigue severity were noted at the 11th week following treatment completion. Irvine and colleagues[21] obtained similar results in a study in which fatigue was assessed in women with breast cancer during adjuvant radiotherapy and at three and six months following treatment completion by means of the Pearson Byars Feeling Checklist.[19] Consistent with prior research, results indicated that levels of fatigue during radiotherapy treatment were significantly higher than the pretreatment level. However, by the three-month follow-up, the severity of fatigue had returned to the pretreatment level and remained at this level at the six-month follow-up. Hann et al[26] also obtained results indicating that fatigue does not persist following completion of adjuvant radiotherapy. In this study, the POMS Fatigue Scale,[13] the Fatigue Symptom Inventory,[16] and the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory[17] were used to assess fatigue in breast cancer patients who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy an average of 22 months previously and were recurrence-free at the time of follow-up. Fatigue was also assessed in an age-matched comparison sample of women with no history of cancer. The two groups were not found to differ in terms of the duration or disruptiveness of fatigue or in their levels of global, somatic, cognitive, affective, or behavioral symptoms of fatigue. Differences in fatigue severity were also nonsignificant, with the exception of ratings of the most fatigue experienced in the past week. Compared to the age-matched comparison group, the former radiotherapy patients reported higher levels of fatigue on the day they felt most fatigued in the past week.
What conclusions, if any, can be drawn from these studies? Taken together, the findings fail to provide clear evidence that fatigue following adjuvant radiotherapy is a clinically significant phenomenon. Heightened fatigue does appear to be common during the course of radiotherapy; however, the studies reviewed indicate that recovery to a pretreatment level typically occurs within several weeks of completing treatment.[20,21] Moreover, one study has shown that the level of fatigue experienced by women previously treated with adjuvant radiotherapy cannot be distinguished from the level experienced by women of similar age with no history of cancer.[26] Although one study reviewed did report a relatively high prevalence of fatigue among women previously treated with radiotherapy,[25] the significance of this finding remains unclear in the absence of comparison or normative data. To the extent that fatigue is common in the general population, relatively high prevalence rates may not be clinically significant. It should be noted that findings suggesting the absence of heightened fatigue following adjuvant radiotherapy refer to the experience of the "average" patient. In each of the studies reviewed, there was evidence of considerable variability in patient reports of fatigue. Accordingly, there may be a subgroup of former radiotherapy patients for whom fatigue is an important clinical problem. Identifying these patients and determining why they experience heightened fatigue should be a focus of future research.
Fatigue After Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation
Autologous bone marrow transplantation or, more precisely, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support, is one of the newest forms of breast cancer treatment. Once limited primarily to patients with metastatic disease, autologous bone marrow transplantation is increasingly being performed on women with earlier-stage disease characterized by lymph node involvement. Table 3 lists studies that have examined fatigue in women with breast cancer previously treated by means of autologous bone marrow transplantation.
In one of the first studies to examine this issue, Hann and colleagues[32] surveyed women who had completed autologous bone marrow transplantation for either metastatic or nonmetastatic breast cancer an average of 20 months previously and in an age-matched comparison group of women with no history of cancer. The patient sample was limited to women with no clinical evidence of disease at follow-up. Fatigue was assessed in both groups using the POMS Fatigue Scale,[13] the Fatigue Symptom Inventory,[16] and the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory.[17] Compared to women with no history of cancer, former transplant patients reported more severe fatigue, greater duration of fatigue, worse quality of life due to fatigue, and more behavioral, mental, and global symptoms of fatigue. Among former transplant patients, more severe fatigue was related to poorer sleep quality, higher levels of anxiety and depression, and more time elapsed since transplant. In contrast, fatigue severity was unrelated to patient age, disease stage at transplant, length of hospitalization for transplant, or current use of tamoxifen.
Additional evidence of fatigue following autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer comes from a recently published study by van Dam et al.[33] Participants in this study were breast cancer patients with nonmetastatic disease who were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue (ie, autologous bone marrow transplantation). Patients with no evidence of disease recurrence were assessed an average of 1.6 years (transplant group) and 1.9 years (chemotherapy group) following treatment completion. Data also were obtained from a sample of breast cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy alone an average of 2.4 years previously. As part of a larger investigation of quality of life, fatigue was assessed in all three groups using the fatigue symptom scale of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30.[34] Results indicated that patients who underwent transplant reported they were more bothered by fatigue than were patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy alone. Differences between patients treated with standard-dose chemotherapy and those treated with surgery and radiotherapy were in the same direction; however, they did not reach statistical significance.
Taken together, the results of these studies provide preliminary evidence that fatigue following autologous transplantation for breast cancer is a clinically significant phenomenon. Women with breast cancer who were an average of more than one year posttransplant have been shown to be more fatigued than women with no history of cancer[32] as well as women with breast cancer who were treated with surgery and radiotherapy only.[33] The magnitude of these differences is considerable. Former transplant patients reported 52% more fatigue than a comparison group of women with no history of cancer (as measured by the POMS Fatigue Scale)[32] and 90% more fatigue than a comparison group of breast cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy (as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30).[33] Preliminary evidence also suggests that fatigue in former transplant patients is accompanied by sleep disturbance and heightened emotional distress.
Comparison of Fatigue Across Different Types of Treatment
The studies reviewed suggest that the degree of fatigue experienced following breast cancer treatment varies according to the specific type of treatment received. Specifically, there is evidence to indicate that fatigue is a significant clinical problem in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation but not in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. In order to directly address the issue of differences in fatigue related to type of treatment, it would be useful to compare patients who received different type treatments and who were assessed with the same measures of fatigue at comparable time points following treatment completion. Three research projects would appear to allow for comparisons of this type.
The first project is a study by Mast,[35] in which fatigue was assessed in 109 women who were recurrence-free and had completed breast cancer treatment an average of 35 months previously (range = 12 to 68 months). These patients were an average of 60 years of age (range = 20 to 90 years) and almost all (99.1%) had either stage I or II disease. Previous treatment consisted of surgery plus one of the following: neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy, radiotherapy only, chemotherapy only, or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Fatigue was assessed in all patients using a revised version of the Symptom Distress Scale.[36] Results indicated that patients treated with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy reported greater fatigue than patients treated without chemotherapy.
The second project consists of three studies conducted at our center in which fatigue was assessed in women previously treated with adjuvant radiotherapy,[26] with adjuvant chemotherapy,[30] or with autologous bone marrow transplantation.[32] The demographic and medical characteristics of patients in these studies are described in the previous sections of this review. Since patients in each of these studies were administered the POMS Fatigue Scale, direct comparisons across type of treatment are possible. As shown in Fig 1, former transplant patients tended to have more fatigue than did former adjuvant chemotherapy patients who, in turn, tended to have more fatigue than did former radiotherapy patients.
The third project is the study by van Dam and colleagues[33] in which fatigue was assessed in women treated with surgery and radiotherapy only, with standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy, or with autologous bone marrow transplantation using the EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue symptom subscale. Results from this project were similar to those from studies conducted at our center; former transplant patients tended to have more fatigue than did former adjuvant chemotherapy patients who, in turn, tended to have more fatigue than did former radiotherapy patients.
The pattern of results observed in these three projects is consistent with the view that fatigue following breast cancer treatment is more likely with systemic therapy (ie, adjuvant chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation) than with nonsystemic therapy (ie, radiotherapy only and surgery only). Since therapy (systemic vs nonsystemic) was not assigned randomly in these projects, the possibility remains that the observed pattern of results is attributable to disease characteristics that are confounded with treatment selection. For example, the results could reflect the fact that women with lymph node involvement or larger tumors are more likely to be treated with systemic therapy than with surgery or radiotherapy only. Determining the relative contribution of disease and treatment factors is likely to be a major focus of future research on fatigue in breast cancer survivors.
Conclusions
A growing body of evidence indicates that fatigue is indeed a long-term side effect of certain forms of breast cancer treatment. The challenge for the future will be to identify the causes of fatigue among breast cancer survivors and to develop interventions that are effective in preventing or reducing fatigue following completion of breast cancer treatment.